Illuminating photography: From camera obscura to camera phone – Eva Timothy
VIew full lesson:
The origins of the cameras we use today were invented in the 19th century. Or were they? A millenia before, Arab scientist Alhazen was using the camera obscura to duplicate images, with Leonardo da Vinci following suit 500 years later and major innovations beginning in the 19th century. Eva Timothy tracks the trajectory from the most rudimentary cameras to the ubiquity of them today.
Lesson by Eva Timothy, animation by London Squared Productions.
thraaaaaaaash videiooooo
What about Oskar Barnack and Leica?
I love your commentary
1:36 wtf?
0:25 HE NEEDS SOME MILK!!!
Dat noodles
Don't like it
dommage que ce ne soit pas en français ?
i know kung fo
BMO is that you?
Thanks
Swear i read illuminatti in the title
Annnnd…. Selfies everywhere…
Yes, Daguerre was actually Niepce's assistant and Niepce was the true inventor of photography. A lot of people give credit to Herschel, Talbot, and Daguerre. I have trouble finding videos with the correct information.
wonderful for kids, thanks!
Excellent piece. Here's more of a question than a criticism, though: what about Nicéphore Niépce with his View from the Window from 1826? Doesn't he predate Daguerre?
amazing!
Awesome tut.
😉
Excellent !
Splendid stuff, from concept to execution. Loved it 🙂
Last time I took a photo it was 2008, I am really bad with cameras… x3
Ah, I almost forgot, John Herschel also happened to be the one who suggested using the world "Photography".
I´m missing a lot of people here. What about Niepce or Wedgewood? But even more important, you completely left out John Hershel, the guy who suggested using hypo to fix the images, as well as introducing the words "positive" and "negative" and inventing his own process, the cyanotype.
Not wanting to sound partisan here, but Daguerre´s method was only successful in the decades inmediately after the invention but by the 1860 it was a dead end (except, funny enough in some parts of the US). The wet plate method has actually more to do with Talbot´s process.
go kodak, go film fuck digital!
Yay Kodak! Sorry I have to have some local pride 🙂 (in the Rochester ny area)
Love this narrator, straight forward, no force humor and over exatratted emotion yet still entertaining.
CHEESE 😀
Opino lo mismo, falta nombrar a Niépce. AgradecerÃa subtitulos. La animación es muy simpática
Dear TEDEducation-Team,
you forgot to mention Joseph Nicéphore Niépce!!! He is one of the inventors of photography as well.
So that's why they never smile!
So that's why they can sketch so well!
I love your accent. It's so rich! 🙂 Great video ^^
I thiught the title said illuminati photographs 0-o
CHEESE!!!
Going to ask this same question!!
And that's my three years of photography club in high school in a nutshell.
I always thought it was magic.
Awesome!
It is because a chemical sensible to light.
Incorrect. Movies made on film are a series of photos but not videos. Image sensors essentially create a magnetic field that is used to arrange magnetic particles on the tape to line up according to the frequencies coming from the sensors. This is a linear process. It's more complicated than this but there's not enough room for details…just research it online.
Amazing invention. They should do one on videos, and then on sound! 🙂
You know so people can see how films became real.
4:22 I have that phone!!!!