Paul Debevec animates a photo-real digital face

42 55



At TEDxUSC, computer graphics trailblazer Paul Debevec explains the scene-stealing technology behind Digital Emily, a digitally constructed human face so realistic it stands up to multiple takes.

TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world’s leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes. Featured speakers have included Al Gore on climate change, Philippe Starck on design, Jill Bolte Taylor on observing her own stroke, Nicholas Negroponte on One Laptop per Child, Jane Goodall on chimpanzees, Bill Gates on malaria and mosquitoes, Pattie Maes on the “Sixth Sense” wearable tech, and “Lost” producer JJ Abrams on the allure of mystery. TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design, and TEDTalks cover these topics as well as science, business, development and the arts. Closed captions and translated subtitles in a variety of languages are now available on TED.com, at Watch a highlight reel of the Top 10 TEDTalks at

42 Comments
  1. MarcTBG says

    It's still super creepy to me.

  2. NEZ says

    Actually when they solve the facial animation it will be much closer. All animations seem smoothed out, you know, like they're bezier'd, and I think that facial microexpressions are more stepped, or linear with some tension. Like "Ed" from Chris Jones, I don't link it because Youtube doesn't let me 🙁

  3. Meteotrance says

    not a cheap process but it's work very well, maybe he should used HDR RED Camera or Blackmagic Design Cinema camera for making animated stuff, instead of Nikon or Canon photo stuff.

  4. Stanislav G. says

    i think that speech was underappreciated

  5. Greg Wasdyke says

    that's not the point.

  6. Northfence Corner says

    Anyone thinking AVATAR?

  7. Albin Karlstroem says

    8.14 two and a half men Charlie copy.

  8. CO2Junkie says

    It's kind of alarming. Now we won't be able to tell the difference between special effects & reality. Video can no longer be considered as proof of anything.

  9. Shadow says

    I concur.

  10. B Hoo says

    you're

  11. Spiny Norman says

    You know who is really going to hate this? George Lucas. NOT!

  12. Swidhelm says

    They weren't trying to make a realistic crowd. Just the one guy. They just for the sake of interest had two lines of them walking crossing though each other. Not a crowd sim.

  13. NietzscheanMan says

    You have no idea what you're talking about and confuse corporatism (made possible by socialists like yourself) with capitalism.

  14. Muphlon says

    i'm sorry, my what?

  15. B Hoo says

    your their target customer

  16. Natalie Grant Logan says

    great animation… but i also loved the new bmw at the end.

  17. gusphraba says

    The running at the end is too smooth.

  18. bornearth says

    That indeed is photorealism. She was nearly perfect. I'm not sure why they added the guy walking at the end because the combined images did not look remotely real. The put so much engery into the fine and gross detail of her face, yet did not consider the nuances of multiple people walking in the same space. Realistically, they could not all be the same height, moving exact body parts at same pace, etc.

  19. Mirror says

    wow.

  20. O&A Fan Videos says

    Those are pretty amazing diffuse and specular maps they get with that. 😮 Very nice results.

  21. hoplahey says

    I am so looking forward to playing my game console at my retirement home in a few decades.

    Should be better than real life. 🙂

  22. II says

    the future of computer graphics looks great.

  23. William Mason says

    Kind of a MRI of light surfaces combined with animations.

  24. NietzscheanMan says

    Shadowshorts, study some economics and stfu while you're at it.

  25. BallinTrollin says

    Videogame designers should watch this vid high.

  26. Lechiffresix six says

    i knwo which one you are rferring to but it nowhere near as realistic as this technology.they plant to recreate Winston Churcl and Hitler for historic purposes those characters will be animated. I like this clip bu the fella whos is doing the presentation thinks everyone works in the 3d industry "shader, texture, colour matrices" WTF! can't those people adapt their lingo to the audience? not everyone uses Maya and Mocap.this video is boring for people outside of the industry.

  27. ChariotRider says

    this technology could be used with another piece of software that is showcased on the Science Channel's "Future Of…" that is a database of sorts that is meant to render a real person and can be used to recreate a conversation with the real person it is trying to emulate, cool stuff!

  28. gothicowl says

    wtf is bmw doing at the end!!!

  29. Justin Danielson says

    Sponsors are a necessary evil. They allow TED to keep running at the high quality we've all come to enjoy.

  30. MonsterLopes says

    Sad to see something as wonderful as TED hijacked by BMW…

    Can't we ever get away from the greasy fingers of business? Seems anything can be bought or sold these days, including integrity.

  31. princeofexcess says

    seen it before.
    we still fall short but this is a step closer

  32. araless says

    wow. I love living in the future.

  33. Henrik Lehnerer says

    cool!

  34. celsius233 says

    Wow, impressive. The only thing that really gives it away in that video is the blink.

  35. jussts says

    Yes.

  36. KeriOwen says

    hmmm, so they created a photoreal digital image by….photographing a model.

  37. RichieW says

    They can barley afford decent cameras these days with all the piracy…

  38. timabad says

    nice!

  39. n3rdbear says

    This technology could be used to hoax news reports and interviews.

  40. uberzwitter says

    I don't see why people are so hostile to CG being improved upon. It's already used in so many ways, but we should stop advancing because your all too xenophobic? Special effects have been around since the beggining of movie making as one form or another, CG is an art in itself, and properly used is very effective…so get over yourselves. Lots of good intelligent and entertaining movies would not have been the same without it, and more will benefit from this.

  41. Peter Cohen says

    Yes, we are. 😉

  42. Hoa Do says

    it may not be as important but it is still a contributing factor. pushing only one boundary isn't gonna get u to perfection or similiar

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.